Point: Agreements Will Help Protect Great Lakes

  • The proposed Annex 2001 agreement is the subject of lively debate as to whether it will help or hinder the conservation of the Great Lakes (Photo by Jeremy Lounds)

In 1998, an Ontario company wanted to sell Lake Superior water overseas. Their proposal raised fears that Great Lakes water could be diverted with little oversight. Now, officials from the eight states and two provinces in the region have come up with two proposed agreements that would regulate new water diversion requests. The proposed agreements are known as the Annex 2001 Implementing Agreements. Great Lakes Radio Consortium commentator Cameron Davis says the agreements are a good first step in protecting a cherished resource:

Transcript

In 1998 an Ontario company wanted to sell Lake Superior water overseas. Their
proposal raised fears that Great Lakes water could be diverted with little oversight.
Now, officials from the eight states and two provinces in the region have come up with
two proposed agreements that would regulate new water diversion requests. The proposed
agreements are known as the Annex 2001 Implementing Agreements. Great Lakes Radio Consortium
commentator Cameron Davis says the agreements are a good first step in protecting a cherished
resource:


When I was growing up, my family and I used to go to the beach every Sunday. As I stood
looking out over Lake Michigan, I was awed at how it seemed to go on forever. Today I know
better. The Great Lakes are a gift left from the glaciers thousands of years ago. That’s
because less than 1% of Great Lakes water is renewed every year from rainfall, snowmelt,
and groundwater recharge.


Two proposed agreements by the states and provinces would make diversions of Great Lakes water
to places outside of the Great Lakes a virtual impossibility.


The agreements look to be a vast improvement over current laws. First, federal law in the U.S.
allows a diversion only if every Great Lakes Governor approves. That seems like a tough standard
to meet, but in fact, it’s already allowed two diversions of Great Lakes water to take place. In
the 1990’s, diversions were approved to Pleasant Prairie in Wisconsin and another one to Akron,
Ohio. The water was used for municipal supplies.


Second, the proposed agreements are an improvement over the Boundary Waters Treaty – a pact
signed between the U.S. and Canada almost 100 years ago. The treaty doesn’t cover one very
important Great Lake: Lake Michigan. Because Lake Michigan is solely within the U.S. and not
shared with Canada, the treaty leaves the lake unprotected. This is a problem because Lake
Michigan is directly connected to Lake Huron. So water diverted out of Lake Michigan means
water diverted out of Lake Huron.


The agreements are a good first step, but they need to be stronger. For example, they require
regional approval for diversions of water that go outside of the basin of more than one million
gallons per day, but they don’t require regional approval for withdrawals of up to 5 million
gallons per day that stay in the Great Lakes. In addition, the draft agreements need to do a
better job at requiring water conservation before potential water withdrawals can be considered.


We have a choice. We can be against the agreements and keep the status quo or work to make
them even stronger. We need to work to protect our region’s water so that our kids can continue
to look out over the Great Lakes and see them for what they are: vast, magnificent, but fragile
natural treasures.


Host Tag: Cameron Davis is the executive director of the Lake Michigan Federation.

Related Links

Plastic Beer Bottles Concern Recyclers

Midwest recycling leaders are concerned about a beer company’s
plans to use plastic beer bottles nationwide. The Great Lakes Radio
Consortium’s Chuck Quirmbach has more:

Transcript

Midwest recycling leaders are concerned
About a beer
Company’s plans to use plastic beer bottles
Nationwide.
The Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s Chuck
Quirmbach has the story:


Milwaukee-based Miller Brewing has been test marketing the
plastic beer bottles for about a year. Now, the company says it’s
ready to be the first U.S. brewer to use the plastic bottles
across the country. Solid waste officials say miller has made
the bottle a bit more recycling friendly, but some experts still
don’t want the bottles at recycling centers.


John Reindl is the
recycling manager for Dane County, Wisconsin. He says the amber-colored plastic

Miller would use for some bottles wouldn’t mix
well with the clear or green bottles that dominate the beverage
industry. So Reindl says the amber bottles would have to be
separated from the waste stream.


“That would cost between 5 and 6 cents a pound, which
means we would essentially get no revenue… so that would impose
a greater cost on our taxpayers.”


Reindl says a thin layer of nylon inside the plastic beer bottles
may also cause recycling problems. But Miller contends it’ll try
to recycle and reuse it’s own bottles, much of their supply may
come from states with bottle deposit laws.


For the Great Lakes
Radio Consortium, this is Chuck Quirmbach.