Search stories & shows
Search

Senate Bill to Limit DNR Reintroduced

Senate Bill to Limit DNR Reintroduced

Credit: Michigan.gov

Host: Rebecca Williams
Show date: 02/07/2013

Summary:

This is the Environment Report. Iím Rebecca Williams.

Right now, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources can set aside land to protect biodiversity.  Basically, that means the DNR can protect the variety of plants and animals that live in that place.

New legislation would limit their ability to do that.

Senate Bill 78 would prohibit the DNR from setting aside an area of land specifically for the purpose of maintaining biological diversity.  The DNR could not make or enforce a rule to do that.

Senator Tom Casperson is the billís sponsor. He says heís concerned the DNR wants to set aside too much land, and that people wonít have access to it.

ďIf theyíre focusing on biodiversity and itís including the idea and concept of keeping people out of it, I guess thatís one thing Iím going to challenge, because theyíve been marching forward pretty hard with that kind of stuff.Ē

This bill is similar to one Casperson introduced last fall, SB 1276.

Governor Rick Snyder told Michigan Radioís Stateside in November that he did not support that bill.  Senator Casperson says this time around, he thinks the bill stands a better chance, because he says he can work it out with the governor.

ďThe problem I think we get caught up in is, when we do something like this, it becomes an all or nothing thing. Where, you know, you donít care for the environment because you donít go along with a biodiversity stewardship area, well itís not that I donít go along with it. Iíve supported set asides, Iíve supported wilderness areas, Iíve voted for those things. But I do think there needs to be more oversight than what has been happening in the past.Ē

So he wants that oversight to come from the legislature.

If the bill is signed into law, it would change the way DNR manages land.

It takes away the conservation of biological diversity from the DNRís duties.

It requires the DNR to balance management with economic values. 

And it strikes language from an existing act that states that most losses of biological diversity are the result of human activity.

ďThat is an extremely well justified scientific principle that humans are the direct cause of biodiversity loss.Ē

Brad Cardinale is a professor of conservation biology at the University of Michigan.

ďBy striking it, it leads me to believe that Casperson is perhaps not aware of the vast scientific evidence for that.Ē

Cardinale says areas with more biodiversity offer all kinds of benefits for people and wildlife... and he says this bill doesnít consider those.

ďAnd all of the language in the bill is essentially arguing that we need to give people higher priority to have access to the land, to be able to extract resources from the land.Ē

Governor Snyder is expected to assign a state agency to analyze the bill.

The DNR will probably be the agency to do that.

Bill OíNeill is the Chief of the Forest Resource Division for the DNR. He says itís too soon to say how exactly the DNR would be affected, but...

ďIt certainly would make it more difficult for us to manage solely or at least for a primary objective of biodiversity. It wouldnít prohibit us from doing it but it would prohibit us from designating a particular area just for that.Ē

He says the DNR is planning to sit down with Senator Casperson and the co-sponsors of the bill to see if they can find a compromise.

ďWhen folks characterize biodiversity as a complete no-touch type of environment I donít think thatís really an accurate depiction of what anybodyís looking for.Ē

OíNeill says just because an area is designated for biodiversity doesnít mean that nothing else can happen there. 

You can find out more about the bill on our website: environment report dot org.

Iím Rebecca Williams.

blog comments powered by Disqus