Court Rules Epa Must Regulate Ballast

  • The EPA is being called to put regulations on ballast water discharges. (Photo courtesy of the USGS)

Ballast water discharges from ocean freighters must be regulated by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. That’s the ruling of a California judge.
The Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s Sarah Hulett reports:

Transcript

Ballast water discharges from ocean freighters must be regulated by the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency. That’s the ruling of a California judge. The Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s

Sarah Hulett reports:


The ruling calls on the EPA to repeal a decades-old exemption for ballast water discharges from the

federal Clean Water Act. Discharges from ships’ ballast tanks have dumped foreign plants and

animals into coastal waters and the Great Lakes. The organisms have wreaked environmental and

economic havoc on native ecosystems.


Jordan Lubetkin is with the National Wildlife Federation.


“By this ruling, ballast water discharge is regulated as a biological pollutant. Ballast water is

treated like a discharge from an industrial facility, or a wastewater treatment facility, and in

this regard it’s no different.”


An EPA spokesman says the agency is reviewing the decision, and its options. The judge has ordered

an April 15th conference for the EPA and the environmental groups that sued to discuss how to move

forward.


For the GLRC, I’m Sarah Hulett.

Related Links

Usda to Boost Use of Ozone-Depleting Chemical?

  • To prevent invasive insects from getting into the country, officials want to increase the application of methyl bromide to wooden pallets. (photo by Kevin Connors)

The USDA wants to increase the use of methyl bromide to keep invasive insects from getting into the country. But some environmentalists are fighting the plan, saying the chemical will do more harm than good. The Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s Chuck Quirmbach explains:

Transcript

The USDA wants to increase the use of methyl bromide to
keep invasive insects from getting into the country. But
some environmentalists are fighting the plan, saying the
chemical will do more harm than good. The Great Lakes
Radio Consortium’s Chuck Quirmbach has more:


The U.S. Agriculture Department wants to nearly double the
use of methyl bromide. The compound is used as a pesticide
to fight invasive insects that come into the U.S. on wooden
pallets. But scientists say methyl bromide is harmful to the
stratospheric ozone layer. The Natural Resources Defense Council
plans to sue the government over its plan. David Doniger is with
the NRDC. He says more use of methyl bromide might reverse advances
made in protecting the upper atmosphere.


“The ozone layer has been badly hurt. It’ll take a long time – 50 years –
to fully heal it… and only if we get rid of all the ozone depleting chemicals.”


Doniger contends the Indiana company that’s a key producer of methyl bromide
has many other products and wouldn’t see any job losses if the government
plan is halted. The USDA argues there are no feasible alternatives to methyl
bromide, so the government says the chemical deserves an exemption from a
1987 international treaty that targets ozone depleting compounds.


For the Great Lakes Radio Consortium, I’m Chuck Quirmbach.

Related Links