Candidate Criticizes Ethanol

  • An ethanol distilling plant under construction. Democratic candidate Mike Gravel argues that producing ethanol is a strain on water resources. (Photo by Lester Graham)

A presidential candidate says ethanol subsidies jeopardize water resources. Democrat
Mike Gravel says producing the alternative fuel could cause over-use of water in some
areas. Samara Freemark has that story:

Transcript

A presidential candidate says ethanol subsidies jeopardize water resources. Democrat
Mike Gravel says producing the alternative fuel could cause over-use of water in some
areas. Samara Freemark has that story:

More corn is being grown for ethanol. Some corn growers pump water from
underground to irrigate their crops. And it takes about four gallons of water to distill a
gallon of ethanol.

Democratic presidential candidate Mike Gravel says that means subsidizing ethanol
could threaten some water resources.

He says Congress is jumping on the ethanol bandwagon without taking the time to look
at harmful side effects. And he says in areas that have seen water loss such as the
Great Lakes, that’s a mistake:

“The farmers who are going to be draining out their aquifers to satisfy the corn needs
are going to find themselves assaulting the Great Lakes. That is a national policy that
doesn’t get any stupider.”

Gravel blames that policy on lobbying by ethanol producers such as Archer Daniels
Midland. ADM has received more than ten billion dollars in federal ethanol subsidies
since 1980.


For the Environment Report, this is Samara Freemark.

Related Links

Nuclear Future Debate

  • A former leader of Greenpeace now wants more nuclear power plants to meet the nation's energy needs. Many environmentalists are vehemently opposed to the idea. (Photo by Samara Freemark)

Environmental and energy groups are sparring over the future of nuclear
power. Samara Freemark has the story:

Transcript

Environmental and energy groups are sparring over the future of nuclear
power. Samara Freemark has the story:


Energy advocate Patrick Moore says only nuclear technology can provide
enough clean energy to make a dent in the nation’s fossil fuel use:


“Why should we build more nuclear power plants? Because that is the only
way that we’re going to be able to substantially reduce fossil fuels. It’s as
simple as that.”


Moore is a former Greenpeace leader who says pushing nuclear power is a
logical evolution of his environmental ideals.


But Mike Shriberg, Director of Environment Michigan, says nuclear power
can’t compete with other alternative power sources:


“Every dollar spent on nuclear energy is a dollar wasted when you compare
it to investing in true clean resources like energy efficiency and renewables.”


And Shriberg says energy produced by wind and solar can be cheaper than
nuclear power. But Moore says we those sources are too unreliable to fill the
nation’s energy needs.


For the Environment Report, I’m Samara Freemark.

Related Links