Study: Kids Eating Organics Have Lower Pesticide Exposure

A new study published in the Journal of the National Institutes of Environmental Health Science finds that children who eat organically grown fruits and vegetables appear to have less exposure to pesticides. The Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s Mark Urycki has details:

Transcript

A new study published in the Journal of the National Institutes of Environmental Health
Science finds that children who eat organically grown fruits and vegetables appear to
have less exposure to pesticides. The Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s Mark Urycki has
details:


Researchers at the University of Washington compared urine samples from children who
ate conventional produce to those from a group who ate mostly organic fruits and
vegetables. They looked for a residue of pesticides. What they found was that children
who ate conventional produce had about six times higher concentration of the chemicals
than those who ate organic food.


And that, wrote the authors, suggests that children can reduce their exposure to pesticides
from above the U.S. EPA guidelines to below, by switching to organic foods. But the
authors could not determine the toxicity of the pesticides. And officials from the
pesticide industry noted that the study could not determine whether the children had eaten
the full strength chemical or merely the by-product after the pesticide had already broken
down.


A few years ago, Consumer Reports magazine tested food and found that conventional
produce did contain more pesticides than organic fruits and vegetables but even the
organics had some pesticides. The magazine suggested the easiest way to reduce
pesticide exposure in food: wash it, with soap and water.


For the Great Lakes Radio Consortium, I’m Mark Urycki.

Control of Water Supply Flows to Foreign Company

A German company is now the owner of large water companies in several Great Lakes states. The trend has many communities concerned about the future of their water supplies, and how foreign ownership may affect water quality, and some advocates want towns to take control of their local water supply. The Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s Jonathan Ahl reports:

Transcript

A foreign company is now the owner of large water companies in several Great Lakes
states (Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania). A German company recently bought
American Water Works. The move has many communities concerned about the future of
their water supplies, and how foreign ownership may affect water quality. And some
advocates want towns to take control of their local water supply. The Great Lakes Radio
Consortium’s Jonathan Ahl reports:


(ambient sound underneath)


Randy West is standing in a small shack behind the main offices of Illinois American
Water Company’s operations in Pekin, Illinois. A huge tank and a series of pipes snaked
around in every direction fill up the cramped room.


“This is one of our wells here, and it is running right now, of course, putting water out
into the system.”


The Illinois town is one of dozens in the Great Lakes region that now has an international
owner of their water system. West says that doesn’t mean much to him. He says it’s all
the same equipment that was in place before RWE took over. He says it’s all run by the
same people. West says nothing has changed since the German company took ownership
of Illinois-American:


“The day that we closed was just another day. and every day since then has been just
another day. We’re doing everything just like we were. There has been no change
whatsoever in how we operate it and how we manage it, how we run the system or
anything.”


West says he’s totally comfortable working for a water company owned by foreign
interests. But a national group is trying to rally support against RWE. Public Citizen, the
public advocacy group run by Ralph Nader, says all cities that are currently served by
American Water Works should look into forcing a buyout of RWE’s holdings and create
a municipally-owned water works. Hugh Jackson is a policy analyst for Public Citizen.
He says local ownership is better because water is a local resource. He also says having
an international owner of a water company can create problems when a community wants
to make sure their water source is safe:


“Let’s say for instance you want to impose a conservation plan. Can an international
company come in and claim because of international trade agreements that local
authorities have no jurisdiction over that company?”


Jackson says RWE does not have a positive record with water companies. He says one of
its subsidiaries, Thames Water of England, has had numerous water quality violations
and has done only the bare minimum to meet standards or has avoided them by paying
fines. Some communities are investigating municipal ownership. Terry Kohlbuss is
helping head an effort in Peoria, Illinois to buy out the water works. But Kohlbuss says
Peoria’s motivation is not about RWE. He says the focus should be on what’s best for the
people, and not vilifying a private company.


“I don’t think there is anything inherently bad or evil about American Water Works,
Illinois American, or RWE. But what happens is that you have the system operated for a
different purpose when it’s an investor-owned utility and even when it’s an international
owner. You are meeting their needs. You exist to meet their needs, not they to meet
yours.”


Kohlbuss says local ownership would provide communities better protection of their
water sources. While safer water may be a reason for local ownership of the water
company, there may be a more pressing reason for cities to look at a buyout. Municipal
budgets are getting tighter and tighter, and every city is looking for a new revenue source.
Many public officials believe they can run their water company more efficiently, provide
better rates, and keep some of the profits at home in city coffers.


For the Great Lakes Radio Consortium, I’m Jonathan Ahl.

Manmade Dead Zone to Block Asian Carp?

The Asian Carp is a huge fish that’s native to China. It was brought over from China and during the Great Flood of 1993 escaped from farm ponds and got into the Mississippi River. The Asian Carp competes with native fish and destroys their habitat. Researchers worry that if the Asian Carp gets into the Great Lakes, it could damage the lakes’ ecosystems. Some scientists believe that the threat of this invasive fish to the Great Lakes fishing industry is great enough to take drastic measures. One proposal would kill part of a river that connects the Mississippi River System to the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s Annie MacDowell reports:

Transcript

The Asian Carp is a huge fish that’s native to China. It was brought over from China and
during the Great Flood of 1993 escaped from farm ponds and got into the Mississippi
River. The Asian Carp competes with native fish and destroys their habitat. Researchers
worry that if the Asian Carp gets into the Great Lakes, it could damage the lakes’
ecosystems. Some scientists believe that the threat of this invasive fish to the Great
Lakes fishing industry is great enough to take drastic measures. One proposal would kill
part of a river that connects the Mississippi River System to the Great Lakes. The Great
Lakes Radio Consortium’s Annie MacDowell reports:


Since late in the 19th century until now, Chicagoans have spent billions of dollars to
clean up their water. Untreated sewage used to flow into the Chicago River and was
carried into Lake Michigan, where the city got its drinking water.


In the summer of 1885, 12 percent of the population of Chicago died of cholera and
other diseases because of fouled water.


Phil Moy is with the Wisconsin Sea Grant. He says before modern-day sewage treatment
plants, the river was a cesspool.


“You go back far enough, like before there was really even much more than primary
treatment… you had cattle carcasses and all sorts of nasty things floating and actually in
the river itself.”


More than a century ago, city planners decided to reverse the flow of the Chicago River,
to protect people’s health. This involved digging a larger and deeper canal that connected
the Mississippi River system to the Great Lakes. From then on, sewage dumped in the
Chicago River flowed downstream instead of into the lake. Chicagoans’ water supply
was no longer tainted, but the project opened up a way for fish and other species to travel
between the rivers and the Great Lakes. So Chicago’s efforts to clean up the sewage back
then, has caused unintended consequences a century later.


Now scientists are trying to find ways to stop exotic species that have invaded the
Mississippi from getting into the Great Lakes and exotic species that have invaded the
Great Lakes from getting into the Mississippi. Ships and barges use the canal to transport
goods, so putting up a physical barrier wouldn’t work. For now, the government has
spent more than a million dollars on an electric barrier that repels the fish, but they need a
second electric barrier for extra protection. However, more money from the government
to build the second barrier has been slow in coming.


So in the interim, some experts have come up with an idea… a temporary solution that
flies in the face of the Clean Water Act. They want to pollute the river again.


Jerry Rasmussen is with the Mississippi Inter-State Cooperative Resource Association.
The group tries to coordinate states’ efforts to protect the river system. Rasmussen says
creating a dead zone could be done easily and at low cost.


“Probably the least expensive thing to do in this situation would be shutting down some
of the treatments. It would be a cost effective measure, certainly in the interim.”


Rasmussen says the first step would be to shut off the aerators.


(natural sound)


South of Chicago, along part of the canal that connects the Chicago River to the
Mississippi River system, an inoperative aerator sits alongside the water. It’s not needed
in the wintertime, because there’s enough oxygen in the water during the cold months.
During the summertime, the aerators are turned on to help keep the river healthy. But
Irwin Polls of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District says shutting off the aerators
alone during the summer would not reduce the oxygen level enough to be lethal to the
fish.


“Keep in mind, in the early fifties and in the nineteen-sixties, before supplemental
aeration, before the treatment plants were upgraded, the primary fish species in these
waterways were carp and goldfish which could survive at lower oxygen levels than we
have today.”


So if common carp could survive the lower oxygen levels, maybe Asian Carp could, too.
If shutting off the aerators isn’t enough to degrade the river’s water quality, things could
get messy.


Jerry Rasmussen says releasing more sewage waste into the river by omitting the final
stage of waste treatment could be enough to create the dead zone. If not, Rasmussen says
chemicals would need to be added to make the water more toxic. Irwin Polls says this is
a bad idea.


“The kind of chemicals they’re talking about are hazardous. Over one and a half billion
gallons of treated sewage enters this system every day so you’d have to kind of add
enough material to dilute the system that you have in there so we’re talking about large
volumes, continuously, of toxic compounds. So it would be in violation of the law, the
federal laws, as far as introducing toxic compounds and the cost I think would be
astronomical, because the volume of water is tremendous.”


Breaking federal law is the major obstacle to implementing the dead zone plan. To
violate the Clean Water Act, scientists would have to get the support of the Mayor of
Chicago, the Illinois Governor, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
ultimately the President.


But some scientists believe they’ve got to do something now to stop the Asian Carp.
They’re worried the carp might get into Lake Michigan while they wait to get enough
government money to make repairs on the existing electric barrier, and to buy and install
the second. They hope to have the second line of defense in place in a year. A meeting
with government leaders and experts on invasive species has been scheduled for
sometime in May. That’s when the plan’s supporters will try to convince policy-makers
to kill part of the river.


For the Great Lakes Radio Consortium, I’m Annie MacDowell.

Biologist Devotes Life to Island Wolves

  • Wildlife biologist Rolf Peterson holds up the antler of a moose. Peterson has been studying wolves and their prey on Isle Royale for more than 30 years. (Photo by Lester Graham)

It’s been a cold winter this year, especially for Rolf Peterson. Peterson is a wildlife biologist who studies wolves and moose on Isle Royale. Every year starting in January Peterson spends several weeks on the island at the northernmost spot in Michigan surrounded by the frigid waters of Lake Superior. The environment is harsh, but Peterson says it’s the best time to observe wild animals, and as the Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s Gretchen Millich reports… his research has uncovered some of our most basic knowledge about predators and their prey:

Transcript

It’s been a cold winter this year, especially for Rolf Peterson. Peterson
is a wildlife biologist who studies wolves and moose on Isle Royale. Every
year, starting in January, Peterson spends several weeks on the island, at the
northernmost spot in Michigan, surrounded by the frigid waters of Lake Superior.
The environment is harsh, but Peterson says it’s the best time to observe wild animals.
And as the Great Lakes Radio Consortium’s Gretchen Millich reports, his
research has uncovered some of our most basic knowledge about predators and their
prey:


Isle Royale National Park has been compared to a priceless antique… a place that
will be even more valuable in the future. It’s an isolated wilderness, where wolves are
free to hunt as they have for centuries, protected from the threat of humans. No one is
more aware of the value of Isle Royale than Rolf Peterson, a wildlife biologist at
Michigan Tech University. Peterson has spent much of his life on this island. The
attraction for him is that humans are not in charge. It’s wolves, moose and other wild
animals that have the run of the park.


“In this particular place, society has said we’ll just let things go and do whatever
they do. And that could happen now really only in a national park. This happens to
be an island national park, so it has all the attributes which make it a real natural
outdoor laboratory.”


The study of wolves on Isle Royale was started by Durwood Allen of Purdue
University in 1958. In 1970, he chose Peterson, a graduate student, to help him
wrap up the program. But Peterson didn’t end the study. Instead, he made it his
life’s work. Right now, Peterson is on Isle Royale, tracking the wolf packs and
checking to see how many moose they have killed. This technique only works
in the winter, when the trees are bare and Peterson can follow wolf tracks in the snow
from an airplane.


“The anticipation peaks in January when we finally get here and take those first
couple flights to see what’s happened in the past year. You know which
packs are still here, are they going up or going down. Each year it’s a brand new
revelation, almost guaranteed.”


Wolves first came to Isle Royale in 1949 – by crossing the ice on Lake Superior.
There they found a moose population with no natural predators.


For many years, Peterson believed that the size of the moose population was driven
only by their food supply and the condition of their habitat. But in the 1980’s, he made
one of the most important discoveries about predators in the wild.


“It wasn’t until events during the 1980’s in which wolves either went up real fast or
down real fast and the moose population responded in inverse fashion that
I realized – wow, wolves really do make a difference in many cases. So now
I tend to think that wolves are one of the primary drivers of population change
in their prey.”


What Peterson observed was an interdependency between predator and prey: Moose
provide food for wolves, while wolves prevent overpopulation in the moose herd by
hunting the old, the young and the sickly. It’s an idea that has had implications
in areas around the world, where moose are hunted by humans.


“The wolf has really shaped moose as we know it and in places where we use moose
consumptively, the more we can adopt the harvest patterns of wolves, the more
productive our use of moose will be, because this is the pattern that moose have evolved
with for millions of years.”


Peterson’s family shares his fascination with wildlife. His wife Candy and their
two sons have spent many summers on Isle Royale, looking for wolf and moose
carcasses to add to Peterson’s bone collection.


But during the winter, it’s only Peterson and his assistants who brave the cold of this
wilderness to follow wolf tracks in the snow. Peterson says he intends to
follow those tracks and the interaction between wolves and moose on
Isle Royale for many years to come.


For the Great Lakes Radio Consortium, this is Gretchen Millich.